Summary
BioShock 4has a huge legacy to uphold. The series has been absent since the second episode ofBioShock Infinite’s Burial at Sea DLC expansion, and in the decade since it’s only become more loved by fans. The new project is being developed by Cloud Chamber instead of the now-defunct Irrational Games, which means changes are likely.
It’s a game that has to play it safe to bring people back in, but also be creative enough to feel like a trueBioShockexperience. The first is a masterpiece, even all these years later, so while the 2013 trip to the skies is great,BioShock 4should seek more influence from 2007.
RELATED:After BioShock 4, Cloud Chamber Should Consider Spin-Offs Instead of Full Sequels
BioShock’s Game Design is a Formula Perfected
WhileBioShock Infinitewas a good game in its own right, and its ambition paid off with a wonderful setting and compelling story the gameplay wasn’t on par with the original. It prioritized the guns over the vigors too much, meaning the experimental, scientific feeling of blasting enemies with elemental damage and the like wasn’t as necessary to endure the challenging enemy encounters. As a result,BioShock Infinitefelt more like a conventional shooterthan any other in the franchise.
InBioShock, unleashing a torrent of bees or using telekinesis to launch unassuming items towards threats was not just amusing, but essential to the game’s core design.BioShockkeeps the combat balanced, so there isn’t one prevailing way to progress through the story, and the creativity of players can make them either more dangerous or more vulnerable, depending on their understanding of the mechanics.BioShock 4would do well to harness that kind of philosophyto keep both the tension and the challenge high.
BioShock 4 Needs to be Different
Between the likes ofClockwork RevolutionandJudas, as well as the abundance of other typical shooters,BioShock 4has to get creative with its ideas to stand out. The 2007 original did this in spades. Some of its quirks were inspired bySystem Shock 2, but the merging of the unique gameplay, dense atmosphere, and complex political themes made it instantly recognizable, and 15 years later it remains one of a kind.
BioShock Infinite’s lighter aesthetic and heavier emphasis on gunplay puts it in line with other games in the first-person shooter genre, and its early-20th-century aestheticisn’t a million miles away from something likeWolfenstein.Gaming needs more, new games that are genuinely unsettling and frightening to play, and whileBioShockisn’t the typical survival horror, it comes close, and the lighter look ofInfinitedoesn’t facilitate that.
BioShock 4 Should be a Solo Affair
Elizabeth was one of the best parts ofBioshock Infinite, doing well to assist Booker’s efforts while narratively pairing her rational intelligence with Booker’s gruff, shoot-first feel. She’s a character who is the heart and soul of the project, but ifBioShock 4tries to replicate its success, there’s a chance it will fall flat. Players rememberBooker and Elizabeth’s story in large part because it contrasted with the first title in the series, and the fourth game will instantly be judged againstBioShock Infiniteif it takes a two-protagonist approach.
Bioshockis deliberately lonely. Jack is in a city he knows nothing about, and the only friendly voice he has through the first half turns out to be nothing of the sort. That isolation is golden, making the simple feat of leaving Rapture turn into a frightening proposition and one that wields a great deal of unnerving moments. To have a companion tag along could break the atmosphere, as well as present AI issues that could shatter the immersion.
BioShock Infiniteis a great gameand one that is in the upper tier of shooters available on the PlayStation 3 and Xbox 360. Its setting, characters, and story are worthy of so much praise, but the series' peak was at the very beginning, asBioShock’s inventive gameplay and thick tension have yet to be truly replicated. The upcoming fourth game should use it as a blueprint while also forging something fresh.
